Sheena Iyengar studies choices,
how we make them and what makes us think we are good at it. She gave a
presentation at the TEDGlobal conference on "The Art of Choosing" that raised some assumptions worth reflecting upon. Her research highlighted
upon the ideas that we as Americans believe that we should make our own
choices, the more options we have the better our choices will be and that we
should never say no to choice. I found
these ideas to be eye opening on a personal level, something I have never
considered up until listening to her speak on choices. I think there is an
importance to consider how these assumptions factor into the possible effects
within the realm of leadership, too. I have never consciously realized that not
everyone gets to make decisions and choices the way I do in my personal life,
in my town, in my state, in my country or in the world. If I placed myself at
one end, representing the smallest point and the world at the other,
representing the largest and examined the spectrum in context, I see that the
further away I am removed from myself the more different choice can be for an
individual. I lost sight of the freedoms that I have as an American, in
particular, not to mention other factors like the time period in which I was
raised and currently live.
The first concept is that we
should make our own choices. More specifically, Iyengar (2010) explains that we
feel that if a choice affects you, you should be the one to make the decision,
as it is the only way to ensure for interests or preferences to be fully
accounted for. For me personally, I automatically agreed upon hearing this,
thinking: “Well of course I should make my own choices, no one else is as
equipped to decide for me as I am.” Apparently this is a major sticking point
with me. If I had my way, I would want to be consulted with for every option
that touched my life including the new stoplight on the street that I live.
When I realize this is how I feel, I see how impractical this can be. I am not
an expert on road engineering, nor can I account for others that also use the
same street. I am fiercely protective on choosing for myself and the sense of
independence and control it allows me to feel. Though I am more inflexible in
regards to decision making in my home life, the impact it can have in my work
life or leadership context has not escaped my attention. If a group of people
representing an organization gathered together and only chose in regards to
pleasing themselves, that would wreck havoc in terms of inefficiency and create
chaos, potentially. It is important to understand the underlying mission statement
and work being carried out; then using choice to best compliment those goals. A
good leader can take into account varying human factors and guide choices that
will be in line with what is intended to be accomplished.
The second assumption that Sheena
Iyengar chronicles is that the more choices you have, the more likely you are
to make the better choice. I find this fundamentally flawed and take issue with
this statement. I love choices. I am probably a terrible decision maker when
presented with too many choices. For example, when I moved into a house that I
no longer rented and became able to decorate in any manner that would be
pleasing to me, either temporary or permanent, I flat out rejoiced boastfully
that I was going to paint the walls and not have to look at another of my adopted
mother’s variation of beige paint colored walls. In line with the first
assumption that since I have to see these walls daily, I am the best person to
pick the color; however, the second assumption of having all the colors one
could chemically dream up to choose from has left me at a loss. Three years
into living in my home, every single wall is still regular, plain white. I have
had a myriad of options taped onto my wall and I just cannot commit. The same could
be said for my diet. I love soda and know that visibly it is not doing me any
favors. If given every option possible, instead of selecting the healthier
water or green tea, I would go for soda every time. In my opinion the better
choice is being made, the better choice for flavor, that is, not health. My
impulsivity, even with having the ability to understand the detriments of my
actions shows how this is not necessarily a positive option for people as
individuals or in a collective. It is easy to see poor decision making all
around with defaults on home loans, legal sentences for breaking laws and
health issues spanning from fast food to illegal substances.
Something else to consider within
this same arena is that even if you are able curb those whims, how can you make
the best decision when you are flooded with so many products, biased reviews
and advertising that can be misleading or not fully informative? I attempted to
procure a home computer prior to beginning my Master of Science in Leadership
program and was overwhelmed and inundated with all of the choices, though my
intentions were purely to pick the best item for the best value. Iyengar (2010)
does point out that “unlimited choices seem more attractive in theory than in
practice.” In my opinion, that if too many options are problematic on an individual
level then it would be equally daunting in an amplified context of the affects
on a group of people. I think too many options on how a group would want to
move forward on a project, for example could cause problems. It does not seem
necessary or effective to vote on fifty choices, opposed to perhaps, three
solid, well-founded choices narrowed down by those in a leadership role.
Lastly, you should never say no
to choice. Iyenagar (2010) makes it clear that she feels that ‘not saying no to
choice’ seems to be the most problematic of the assumptions. While I feel that
I understand the line of thinking in which this was derived, likely closely
tied to the first assumption that you should make your own choices, it gives
way to thinking that can be clouded with logical fallacies. Instead of feeling
forced to make a choice between limited options, or even too many, it is okay
to decline from deciding at all. It also may be in your best interest to allow
someone more qualified on the issue to inform you on the best option and then
trust in their counsel. For example, it could be wise to submit to a doctor or
a lawyer’s opinions. I think it is
dangerous for someone to feel trapped in making choices. I think this is very
important to keep in mind when you working within a team environment. I think
it sets the individual and team up for potential fallibility of feeling that there
is urgency to make a decision alone. For me, I think earlier on in my career I
felt like I was not attending to my job duties if I were tasked with making a
decision and didn’t make one on my own.
I would not have seen declining from choice as a viable avenue. If presented
with two bad options, I would pick the lesser of the two evils, which does not
mean you make the correct choice of the two. It is important to remember to
impress upon the culture of a group that it is okay to look for better options,
you do not need to feel like you have to take the first option that comes along
and that it is okay to discuss the options together. Two heads are better than
one.
I was truly delighted to be able
to watch another great TED presentation and found Sheena Iyengar inspiring and
captivating. I encourage anyone interested to view her presentation, which can
be located by following the information below found in my reference section. On
a side note, the title of the presentation is Ballet Slippers or Adorable and
references a decision on choosing a light shade of nail polish. Being the nail
polish enthusiast that I am and a naturally curious mind I guessed that it
these were Essie brand colors and was correct. I had to see for myself their
similarity and what my preference would be so I went to the store to compare
them for fun. In my opinion I prefer Ballet Slippers because it is a true light
pink, whereas Adorable (actually Adore-a-ball) is more of a neutral. Fun fact,
which is not an Appeal to Authority, it has been said that Queen Elizabeth II
has worn Ballet Slippers since 1989.
Reference: Iyengar,
S. (2010) The art of choosing. TEDGlobal.
retrieved from: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/sheena_iyengar_on_the_art_of_choosing.html
retrieved from: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/sheena_iyengar_on_the_art_of_choosing.html
No comments:
Post a Comment